TidBITS#502/18-Oct-99
=====================

  Bitter about Apple's speed reductions for the Power Mac G4 line,
  or merely confused about what's happening? Matt Deatherage
  examines the hullabaloo to determine what went wrong and why. Adam
  reports back from a day at Internet World, and in the news we
  cover Apple's $111 million quarterly profit and the releases of
  Keyspan's Digital Media Remote, Action Files 1.5, and SoundJam MP
  1.1.1. This week's poll: How much does digital video editing
  interest you?

Topics:
    MailBITS/18-Oct-99
    Report from Internet World NY 1999
    Speed Dips for Power Mac G4s

<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-502.html>
<ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/pub/tidbits/issues/1999/TidBITS#502_18-Oct-99.etx>

Copyright 1999 TidBITS Electronic Publishing. All rights reserved.
   Information: <info@tidbits.com> Comments: <editors@tidbits.com>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by:
* READERS LIKE YOU! You can help support TidBITS via our voluntary <- NEW!
   contribution program. Our thanks this week to Peter Miller,
   Allen Carter, and Sarah Garrison for their gracious support!
   <http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>

* APS Technologies -- 800/443-4199 -- <sales@apstech.com> -- How
   do you back up your APS hard disks? Try APS tape, removable,
   magneto-optical, and CD-R drives! <http://www.apstech.com/>

* WinStar Northwest Nexus. Visit us at <http://www.nwnexus.com/>.
   Internet business solutions throughout the Pacific Northwest.

* Small Dog Electronics -- Power Mac 6100 8/230/CD: $169! <---------- NEW!
   Grape 266 MHz iMac Demos with New Epson 740i (Grape): $1,059!
   Farallon Skyline PC Card for Wireless Networking: $285!
   For Details: <http://www.smalldog.com/> -- 802/496-7171

* iCOLOR COORDINATION FROM OUTPOST.COM! Choose your flavor with <---- NEW!
   confidence! iMac, matching Artec scanner and more for only
   $969.95. Que! CD-RW Drive, free media, carrying case: $289.95.
   FREE U.S. shipping! <http://www.tidbits.com/tbp/icolor.html>

* CLEARANCE SALE!! It's the MacAcademy Year End Closeout! <---------- NEW!
   We are moving inventory before the new millennium, making it
   the perfect time to catch some deals. Visit us on the Web at
   <http://www.macacademy.com/tidbits.html> or call 800/527-1914.

* NEW 16 PORT MODEL! Network your 10Base-T & 100Base-T devices <----- NEW!
   with Farallon's 8, 16, & 24 port FAST STARLET DUAL SPEED HUBS.
   All hubs come with lifetime warranty & free technical support.
   <http://www.farallon.com/tidbits/dualspeed.html>

* ~ Internet Radio Software <---------------------------------------- NEW!
   Live Weather Software
   News, Sports, Stocks - Scrolling Ticker Software
   ... all at the MacAlive Store .... <http://www.macalive.com/>

* THE INTERNET'S DISCOUNT MAC SUPERSTORE! --> 999mac.com
   All new from Aladdin!  Shrink Wrap, Private File, StuffIt
   and more. TidBITS customers special:  buy 2 Get 1 Free!
   Tons of new products! <http://www.999software.com/mac/tb4.tmpl>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

MailBITS/18-Oct-99
------------------

**Apple Posts $111 Million Profit** -- Apple Computer announced a
  net profit of $111 million on $1.34 billion in revenue for its
  fourth fiscal quarter, with earnings of $601 million on $6.1
  billion in revenue for the 1999 fiscal year. Apple's Q4 results
  were down 14 percent from the same quarter a year ago, but Apple's
  1999 revenue and earnings were up from 1998, which had earnings of
  $309 million on $5.9 billion in revenue. Apple's gross margin for
  its fourth quarter was a healthy 28.7 percent, but the Q4 earnings
  reflect one-time gains from restructuring and seemingly perpetual
  sales of shares in ARM Holdings plc.; without these, Apple's net
  profit would have been $90 million. International sales accounted
  for only 35 percent of Apple's revenues this quarter. Although
  Apple's results technically beat analysts' expectations - after
  issuing a warning a few weeks earlier to reduce those expectations
  - Apple attributes the revenue slump to costs associated with
  product transitions and limited availability of the PowerPC G4
  processor from Motorola. Rampant rumors of new systems were
  another factor, causing some customers to put off purchasing
  decisions. Apple says it expects a strong December quarter. [GD]

<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/1999/oct/13q4results.html>
<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/1999/sept/20q4earn.html>


**Keyspan Offers Remote Control for Software** -- Keyspan is now
  shipping the Digital Media Remote, a small hardware
  transmitter/receiver combination that provides remote control
  capabilities for digital media playback software, such as
  QuickTime Player, PowerPoint, MP3 players, CD players, and DVD
  players. The Digital Media Remote receiver plugs into a USB port
  and accepts infrared signals from the 15-key remote control from
  up to 35 feet away. The receiver converts the signals from the
  remote into keystrokes for controlling applications. The Digital
  Media Remote includes key maps for popular applications, and you
  can customize the software to work with any application. The
  Digital Media Remote costs $79 and is available from Keyspan
  resellers. [ACE]

<http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/remote/>


**Action Files 1.5 Works with Navigation Services** -- Power On
  Software has released Action Files 1.5, a new update to its
  utility for enhancing the functionality of Open and Save dialog
  boxes. (See "Get a Piece of the Action Files" in TidBITS-434_ for
  a review of Action Files 1.0.) Version 1.5 integrates with
  Navigation Services (the enhanced file dialogs that Apple
  introduced with Mac OS 8.5), adds a selection of new features and
  performance enhancements, and is compatible with Mac OS 9. Action
  Files 1.5 also integrates recent and favorite items with Action
  Menus, another Power On utility derived from the Now Menus
  component of the now-defunct Now Utilities package. Current owners
  of Action Files can update to version 1.5 for free (it's a 2.1 MB
  download); otherwise, an electronic version of Action Files 1.5
  costs $30 from Power On, and CD-ROM versions are available from
  Power On and other vendors for $40. [GD]

<http://www.poweronsw.com/site2/html/products/af.html>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=04931>


**SoundJam MP 1.1.1 Adds Mac OS 9 Support** -- Casady & Greene has
  released SoundJam MP 1.1.1, a free update to the company's all-in-
  one MP3 player and encoder (see "That MP3eaceful, Easy Feeling,
  Part 2" in TidBITS-501_). Despite the small version increment from
  1.1, SoundJam incorporates a number of changes and bug fixes. Most
  important, SoundJam 1.1.1 offers compatibility with Mac OS 9,
  improved encoding options, enhanced shuffle ordering, support for
  multiple tracks in certain streams, and a Get Info command for the
  current song in the Player window. The update is a 1.5 MB
  download. [ACE]

<http://www.soundjam.com/>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05603>


**Quiz Results: Apple's International Sales** -- Last week's quiz
  testing your knowledge of the percentage of Apple's sales from
  countries other than the United States was tripped up by Apple's
  mid-week announcement of quarterly results. In Apple's third
  fiscal quarter of the year, international sales accounted for 45
  percent of Apple's sales, but in the just-closed fourth quarter,
  that percentage dropped to 35 percent. The drop was likely related
  to Apple's availability problems with the iBook and Power Mac G4
  machines, and perhaps to increased education sales, which come
  primarily in the U.S. Roughly 45 percent of readers knew the
  "correct" answer, with 32 percent guessing high and 22 percent
  guessing low. [ACE]

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05607>


**Poll Preview: Digital Video Editing** -- With the new iMac DV
  machines and iMovie software, Apple is targeting a potentially
  nascent market for consumers who want to edit digital video.
  Previous attempts to tap the market, as with the Performa 6400
  video editing systems, failed to catch on. So the poll question on
  our home page this week is, how appealing do you find the iMac
  DV's digital video capabilities? [ACE]

<http://www.tidbits.com/>


Report from Internet World NY 1999
----------------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <ace@tidbits.com>

  Last week I spent a day at the Internet World trade show in New
  York City's Jacob Javits Convention Center, the same venue that
  has hosted recent Macworld Expositions in July. It was an
  interesting experience, and I found it even more so when I went
  back and read Matt Neuburg's report from 1997's Internet World in
  Los Angeles.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=00695>

  I was initially struck by the show's size. Two and a half years
  ago, Matt commented on the sparse attendance, but last week's
  Internet World was huge, taking up perhaps three to four times the
  space used by Macworld Expo and filling much of that space with
  attendees. I suppose it's not surprising: the Internet has not
  only grown at its standard breakneck pace, it's become ever more
  driven by large businesses and the consumer masses.


**Common Themes** -- Business turned out to be the common
  denominator for the show, with seemingly every booth trying to fit
  "ecommerce" into the description of their company or product - the
  number of ecommerce tools and services was astonishing. Almost all
  claimed to have "complete solutions," but even cursory glances at
  product information or snippets of overheard questions indicated
  that many of these claims were probably overblown.

  A few other themes appeared - judging from the number of booths
  pushing such products, someone believes that audio email will be a
  big deal. Personally, I can't see it happening. Eudora Pro has
  included the PureVoice plug-in for sending audio email for some
  time and in my testing it combines the worst aspects of email with
  the worst aspects of voice mail. I'm sure many of these products
  are technically impressive, but I don't see what problem audio
  email solves that people are willing to suffer its trade-offs -
  large file size, no way to search the contents, and a lack of
  meta-information that makes scanning and archiving difficult.

<http://www.eudora.com/>

  Several firms were on the cusp of announcing gift registry
  services, which intrigued me, since I've been procrastinating for
  years about creating a database for my family to share gift ideas.
  Some of my design goals were more than these gift registry
  services could handle currently - like making sure people couldn't
  see gifts suggested or already purchased for them by others - but
  I suspect that within a year or so, we'll have extremely
  sophisticated ways of making and sharing wish lists.

<http://www.giftgenie.com/>
<http://www.ivebeengood.com/>

  Many booths advertised products or services promising to help you
  create "community" around your Web site. These companies didn't
  seem to understand that communities evolve organically around
  shared interests. Good tools enhance an existing community, but
  community happens only when people congregate, not when someone
  implements a Web-based message board. Simple tools - such as
  mailing lists - suffice if enough people are interested in acting
  as though they're in a community.


**Unusual Ideas** -- Although I mostly write about the Macintosh,
  I keep up with the Internet world through trade magazines and
  general contacts. Still, I was amazed at how many companies I'd
  never heard of, which turned out to be related in part to the
  number of companies that haven't shipped products. The number of
  unknowns, combined with the vast number of exhibitors, forced me
  to walk the floor quickly, stopping only when a booth managed to
  attract my attention.

  I was flummoxed by one booth and name, so I stopped - and I'm glad
  I did, since they had an idea I've not seen before. The company is
  called Savedaily.com and their goal is to help individuals save
  money with extremely small investments as they use the Internet to
  shop (there's the ecommerce tie-in!). Here's how it works.
  Savedaily.com has deals with over 80 large Internet merchants so
  that a small percentage of your purchases comes back to you in the
  form of purchase bonuses, which Savedaily.com invests for you in
  one of two mutual funds. You can also invest small amounts - as
  low as $5 - online in these mutual funds at any time without
  messing around with minimum deposits, brokers, or commission fees.

  I think it's a brilliant idea. Whether Savedaily.com or another
  firm makes it work in the long run is up in the air, since there's
  no telling the quality of Savedaily.com's mutual funds or the
  stability of Savedaily.com itself. But if the idea catches on,
  large investment houses might well pick up on it.

<http://www.savedaily.com/>

  Other fascinating product ideas came from InfoCharms, an MIT Media
  Lab spin-off that plans to market wireless wearable Internet
  products that integrate into fashion, lifestyle, and health
  applications. The InfoCharms booth had a delightfully academic
  feel, with people from the Media Lab and other educational
  institutions showing off bewitching hardware, such as a pair of
  glasses with a tiny 320 by 240 heads-up display attached to one
  lens. Their main event, which I missed, was the Brave New World
  Unwired Fashion Show, highlighting innovative wearable devices
  using the classic fashion show approach: draping them on
  attractive models.

  Though I didn't see the devices at the InfoCharms booth, I read
  that they plan to commercialize the meme tags I wrote about back
  in "Walking the Meme Streets of the ACM" in TidBITS-458_. Now
  called "Smart Badges," these little devices track of who you meet
  at a trade show and let you trade information back and forth with
  those people. Here's hoping Smart Badges show up soon.

<http://www.infocharms.com/>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05203>


**Demos** -- Internet companies clearly have much more money to
  burn than Macintosh companies exhibiting at Macworld Expo.
  Giveaways and elaborate demos were common. Cable and Wireless
  featured an impressive presentation in which a stony-faced
  announcer intoned the benefits of working with Cable and Wireless
  while a troupe of ghostly looking performers in white juggled,
  danced, and cavorted on stage, synchronized perfectly with the
  announcer's spiel. When the announcer spoke about the reliability
  of Cable and Wireless's backbone network, he dropped a large
  silver ball into a trap door on one side of the stage, walked to
  the other side while saying "With our competitors, you never know
  what your data will look like when it's received," and promptly
  caught a large plastic fish that popped up from another trap door.

  RADWare also drew a crowd by having its demonstrator talking
  intelligently about the company's high end firewall, load
  balancing, and network monitoring products while balancing on a
  tall unicycle and extracting himself from a straitjacket. It's not
  uncommon to see both intelligent presentations or performance
  stunts, but the combination of the two kept the passers-by rapt.


**Thinking Back** -- It's difficult to draw conclusions from my
  short time at Internet World. Short of Matt's article, I can't
  compare it to previous shows, and I get the impression that
  Internet World is quite different every year as some new aspect of
  the Internet catches fire. Still, as a spectator sport, it was
  worth spending the day in New York, and I'd encourage those with a
  strong interest in what drives the Internet to take a pass through
  an Internet World near you.

  Don't go to Internet World if you're hoping to see Apple or a
  significant Macintosh presence. Some companies showed products on
  both iMacs and PCs, but many others were PC-only, didn't support
  Macintosh Web browsers, or were generally Macintosh-clueless. One
  Windows NT security company had a sign that said "Do you worry
  about NT servers?" and a guy at the booth stopped me as I was
  reading it to ask me the same question out loud. I retained
  sufficient presence of mind to say that no, like the U.S. Army, I
  didn't worry about NT servers because I used Mac OS servers. I did
  have several detailed discussions over the sole Power Mac G4 in
  evidence, and ran into a very few Mac-industry friends on the show
  floor. As an example of community, I'll take Macworld Expo over
  Internet World any day.


Speed Dips for Power Mac G4s
----------------------------
  by Matt Deatherage <mattd@gcsf.com>

  Citing limited availability of PowerPC G4 processors from
  Motorola, Apple has reconfigured its Power Macintosh G4 line. The
  new systems are identical to those introduced on 31-Aug-99 in
  every way - including price - except with PowerPC G4 processors 50
  MHz slower than original specifications. The low-end $1,599 model
  still has PCI Graphics; the two high-end models (at $2,499 and
  $3,499) still feature AGP Graphics, dual USB busses, faster system
  bandwidth, and standard DVD drives. Apple also announced that IBM
  will begin manufacturing G4 CPUs during the first half of 2000 for
  use in Apple products, which should eventually reduce Apple's
  reliance on Motorola as its sole source of G4 CPUs.

<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/1999/oct/13g4.html>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05546>

  How should we assess the changes? Customers get less value any way
  you look at it, but depending on your perspective you can think
  that Power Macintosh G4 purchasers are getting the shaft or are
  mild victims of circumstance. Let's examine three possible views
  of the situation.


**The Apple Perspective** -- Apple has two simple problems with
  the Power Macintosh G4 line: DRAM prices have more than doubled
  since July, and the processors it needs to build the originally
  specified machines do not exist in needed quantities. The laws of
  supply and demand are clearly operating here. Apple is
  experiencing exceptionally high demand for its Power Macintosh G4
  machines at current prices, but can produce only a limited supply.
  That means a shortage exists, a situation that normally dictates
  price increases: the higher a system's price, the fewer people
  will order one, reducing demand. Lower demand means smaller
  shortages. Doing nothing would mean continued backlogs, leaving
  customers dangling until Motorola gets its act in gear.

  But there's more than one way to raise prices. You can do it
  outright, or you can redefine the product. Apple has chosen the
  latter, by resetting the performance levels of the Power Macintosh
  models to match the three _available_ levels of PowerPC G4 chips.
  Yes, that's a speed reduction of 50 MHz, but Apple's question to
  customers should be simple: Do you want to wait for months for the
  system that we originally announced, or do you want an identical
  system _now_, except for a decrease in clock speed of about 10
  percent? It's a good argument that gives the decision back to the
  customer, where it belongs. Apple says it can ship 500 MHz G4
  systems in the first calendar quarter of the year 2000. In effect,
  the first Power Macintosh G4 "speed bump" will be to the
  originally announced speeds.

  Apple is no more pleased about this than its customers. In some
  ways, however, the move is disingenuous and driven by the high
  end. The former mid-range 450 MHz configurations were starting to
  ship in reasonable quantities, and the 400 MHz low-end systems
  have had decent availability for a few weeks. The "do you want it
  now or later?" question carries less credence for these systems
  because you could have had them by now at the lower prices.

  Letting customers decide on slower machines with faster delivery
  dates is a good move - and quite valid - for the high end machines
  that are not yet shipping. On the rest of the product line, the
  change just amounts to a price increase, and it's not being
  received well in an industry dedicated to constantly lower prices
  and higher performance.


**The Angry Perspective** -- Customers have a right to be annoyed
  by Apple's reconfiguration; no matter how you look at it,
  customers get less machine for the same money. Last week you could
  walk into a CompUSA store and plunk down $1,599 for a 400 MHz
  Power Macintosh G4. This week, the same money will buy a 350 MHz
  model - 88 percent as fast in terms of raw clock speed - when the
  former 400 MHz models were already widely available.

  As you get to the higher end, the new pricing seems ridiculous. As
  a MacWEEK.com editorial put it: "Users who were prepared on Monday
  to pay $2,499 for a 450 MHz Power Mac G4, for example, can now pay
  the same amount of money for an otherwise identical 400 MHz box
  or pony up another $1,000 for a 450 MHz system that offers the
  same features they were expecting (save for an additional 128 MB
  of RAM)."

<http://macweek.zdnet.com/1999/10/10/editorial.html>

  This isn't quite accurate. Today's 450 MHz machine selling for
  $3,499 is not quite the same machine as yesterday's 450 MHz $2,499
  model. Now that the 450 MHz pre-configured model is Apple's high-
  end offering, it's substantially more beefy. The new $3,499 model
  has 256 MB RAM instead of 128 MB; a 27 GB Ultra ATA/66 hard drive
  instead of a 20 GB model, built-in DVD-RAM instead of DVD-ROM, and
  no 56 Kbps modem you're unlikely to need. Configuring a former 450
  MHz mid-range model to these beefier specifications would add $650
  to the cost. Therefore, the comparison should be between a $3,149
  system and a $3,499 system, not between vastly different
  configurations that happen to share the same microprocessor speed.

  Declaring that the same machines now cost $1,000 more is
  inaccurate by two-thirds. There's only one configuration that
  allows direct price comparisons - 450 MHz AGP Graphics models. The
  old and new configurations share only two clock rates - 400 MHz
  and 450 MHz - but the old 400 MHz model used PCI Graphics, and the
  new 400 MHz model uses AGP Graphics, frustrating direct
  comparison. For identically configured old and new 450 MHz AGP
  Graphics systems, the price differential is $350 - a 14 percent
  price increase. That's nothing to sneeze at, but neither does it
  call for revolution.

  Apple's subsequent move last week to cancel pending G4 orders was
  boneheaded. The company today reversed itself, announcing it will
  honor Power Macintosh G4 orders placed with Apple or resellers
  before 13-Oct-99, provided they were secured by some form of
  payment (such as a deposit or purchase order). Again, a missed
  opportunity - the "deposit" language makes it look like Apple is
  just trying to avoid legal issues, taking emphasis away from Steve
  Jobs's statement: "Good companies make mistakes. Great companies
  fix them."

<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/1999/oct/18g4orders.html>

  Even so, Apple has already significantly damaged its perception in
  the eyes of G4 customers, who were justifiably angry and confused
  at the prospect of re-ordering machines from Apple or its
  resellers. It didn't help that a system ordered months ago might
  now cost more simply because Apple hadn't decided to ship that
  unit yet when other people had already received machines at the
  old prices.

  Customers who ordered 400 MHz or 450 MHz systems will now receive
  those systems, with specifications matching the original orders,
  at the original price. Folks who ordered 500 MHz G4 systems will
  be offered an otherwise identically configured 450 MHz system at a
  discount of $350 - the exact price differential noted above. Apple
  is not accepting orders for 500 MHz systems at this time, so there
  are no waiting lists as reported earlier, according to a
  conversation today with Apple spokesperson Matt Hutchison.


**The Analytical Perspective** -- Somewhere between the rock and
  the hard place are the difficult problems Apple is trying to solve
  with its non-intuitive moves. The company faces huge demand for
  machines it can't produce. If it sits on the existing
  configurations, it delays revenue for another quarter and
  potentially loses sales from customers who want high-end
  performance now. The only way to fill the orders is to eliminate
  the supply problem and switch to chips it can buy.

  Apple can't afford to reduce demand artificially by de-emphasizing
  Power Macintosh G4 models, since market share is still key to
  Apple's public perception. Yet rising DRAM prices are also
  squeezing the company. If Apple reduced price with processor
  speed, it would have a huge backlog of low-cost machines with
  expensive RAM that don't generate the profits it needs to meet its
  business plan. Apple can't afford to turn its highest-margin
  product line into a low-margin system for which it can't meet
  orders.

  From a customer service standpoint, Apple wants to prevent
  backlog, give customers what they want, and sell a ton of
  machines. They can't accomplish any of these with the former
  configurations. The 450 MHz PowerPC G4 chip is the fastest chip
  Apple can buy, and it's not nearly as available as slower models.
  But Apple had the 450 MHz chip in its _mid-range_ model. That's a
  problem. Apple planned for a three-tiered strategy, with the most
  expensive and least-available processors in the most expensive
  systems. The price-based self-selection reserves those models for
  those who both need and can afford the power. Motorola's problems,
  however, put the actual high-end processor in the mid-range
  system.

  Apple was stuck for a high-end system and had to adjust the
  product plan accordingly. If 450 MHz machines are the fastest the
  company can build, it can't very well sell a $3,499 high-end
  machine and a $2,499 mid-range machine with the same processor
  speed. The differences may be worth the money to some, but the
  major _perceptual_ differentiator is megahertz. To keep the mid-
  range 450 MHz system at or near $2,499, Apple would have needed to
  introduce a 350 MHz machine for $1,299 or less. That would
  interfere with iMac purchases, horribly confuse entry-level
  purchasers, and shatter margins. It's no wonder Apple doesn't want
  to talk about this.

  MacWEEK.com notes analyst Lou Mazzucchelli working through similar
  thought processes. If Apple had reduced pricing on the systems, it
  would have stimulated demand as well. That, in turn, might
  maintain the same manufacturing backlog Apple very much wants to
  clear.

<http://macweek.zdnet.com/1999/10/10/configs.html>

  MacWEEK's editorial asks rhetorically, "Does Apple expect _anyone_
  to like these options?" It's the wrong question - the right
  question is "What better choices could Apple offer?" Lower prices
  mean lower margins. Analysts are obviously still very high on
  Apple's business plan, but a quarter of significantly lower
  margins could change that and create the perception that people
  are unwilling to pay the "premium" prices which Wall Street loves
  to associate with Apple. Apple CFO Fred Anderson might be able to
  manage that perception in three months, but it's a risk - and a
  risk to the bottom line as well. If Apple introduces Power
  Macintosh G4 systems in iMac price ranges, many people will want
  such an offering to stick around. That's not good for Apple.

  Neither do critics offer a reasonable alternative on the technical
  front. If Apple can't lower prices, should they have kept the
  existing configurations and let people wait? Hardly. The real
  problem is that Apple failed to manage expectations well. Apple
  seems to believe that nothing it could have said would make people
  feel better about the change so it let the announcement stand
  alone. MacWEEK's editorial didn't like that: "By vacillating about
  this relatively minor specification change, however, Apple is in
  real danger of alienating its core of professional users and
  losing the market momentum that the announcement of G4 systems
  provided the company in the first place."

  Apple's vacillation was less important than its lack of framing
  the change as a way to get the high-powered machines to customers
  faster at prices that match supply and demand. Everyone
  understands that rare products cost more. Apple could simply have
  said, "These prices not only compensate for exorbitant DRAM
  prices, but also provide nearly identical systems priced so that
  those who need the fastest systems can be assured of getting them
  reasonably quickly. As PowerPC G4 production problems are solved,
  we look forward to increased availability driving lower prices and
  even more outstanding price-performance ratios, though these
  systems are still the fastest available in the industry."

  In fact, Apple's announcement contains similar statements - the
  new configurations "match PowerPC G4 chip availability from
  Motorola," and are here "in response to Motorola's delays in
  reaching volume production of its 500 MHz G4 processor chip, which
  is now scheduled for availability early next year." But by linking
  the change just to the 500 MHz G4 chip, Apple missed the chance to
  frame the issue of supply and demand for _all_ the G4 systems,
  leading to customer outrage.

<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/1999/oct/13g4.html>

  No matter how you look at it, Apple has a losing hand - they
  announced G4 systems based on chips Motorola can't supply while
  DRAM prices skyrocketed. They have to both cover higher costs
  _and_ reduce demand, and that means effective price increases.
  Framing it as a 500 MHz issue, however, missed the point for the
  other configurations, which have customers the most annoyed. Apple
  was going to take a hit for this from professional customers no
  matter how it was announced.

  The hit just didn't have to be this big.

  [Matt Deatherage is the publisher of MWJ, the Weekly Journal for
  Serious Macintosh Users, and is busily preparing the
  reintroduction of the daily MDJ. Next week's issue of MWJ will
  include complete Mac OS 9 coverage: you can learn more about MWJ
  and check out a free three-issue trial subscription at the URL
  below.]

<http://www.gcsf.com/>


$$

 Non-profit, non-commercial publications may reprint articles if
 full credit is given. Others please contact us. We don't guarantee
 accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and
 company names may be registered trademarks of their companies.

 This file is formatted as setext. For more information send email
 to <setext@tidbits.com>. A file will be returned shortly.

 For information: how to subscribe, where to find back issues,
 and more, email <info@tidbits.com>. TidBITS ISSN 1090-7017.
 Send comments and editorial submissions to: <editors@tidbits.com>
 Back issues available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/>
 And: <ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/pub/tidbits/issues/>
 Full text searching available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/search/>
 -------------------------------------------------------------------

