TidBITS#583/11-Jun-01
=====================

  Just when you think Apple has cornered the market on cool (with
  the PowerBook G4 Titanium), they up the ante by releasing the tiny
  iBook (Dual USB). Which would you choose? In local news, the
  Washington State Supreme Court upholds the state's anti-spam law,
  which reminds us: what ever happened to TidBITS's spam suit? Also,
  we pass on news of an AppleScript worm, a Microsoft Word macro
  security fix, and a Handspring rebate, plus we welcome Sustainable
  Softworks as a new TidBITS sponsor.

Topics:
    MailBITS/11-Jun-01
    Spam Damned in Washington State
    iBook or TiBook?

<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-583.html>
<ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/2001/TidBITS#583_11-Jun-01.etx>

Copyright 2001 TidBITS Electronic Publishing. All rights reserved.
   Information: <info@tidbits.com> Comments: <editors@tidbits.com>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by:
* READERS LIKE YOU! You can help support TidBITS via our voluntary <- NEW!
   contribution program. Special thanks this week to John Hayden,
   Arthur Zerbey, and Darrel Carnell for their generous support!
   <http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>

* APS Tech -- 800/395-5871 -- <sales@apstech.com>
   Burn a full CD in less than five minutes with the APS CD-RW
   16x10x40 FireWire Plus. FireWire and USB ports let you easily
   connect to all recent Macs. Order at: <http://www.apstech.com/>

* WinStar Northwest Nexus. Visit us at <http://www.nwnexus.com/>.
   Internet business solutions throughout the Pacific Northwest.

* Small Dog Electronics: Canon Digital Video On Sale! <-------------- NEW!
   PowerShot A20: $375; PowerShot S300: $549; PowerShot G1: $739
   ZR20 MiniDV: $619; ZR25MC MiniDV: $749; ZR30MC MiniDV: $799
   Optura pi MiniDV: $1,149! <http://smalldog.com/> - 802/496-7171

* Bare Bones Software BBEdit 6.1 -- Built for Mac OS X
   The award-winning HTML and text editor is now native for
   Mac OS X. Buy, upgrade, or download the demo at our Web site:
   <http://www.barebones.com/> It doesn't suck.

* ConceptDraw v1.61 -- Create your concept! Flowcharting
   and diagramming made easy across Mac OS, Mac OS X
   and Windows. Now also in Spanish and French!
   Give it a try at <http://www.conceptdraw.com/>

* Protect Yourself from Internet Intruders! IPNetSentry is the <----- NEW!
  intelligent, easy-to-use way to deter hackers from your
  Internet-connected Mac. Rated 5 "locks" by SecureMac.com.
  Just $35 from Sustainable Softworks <http://www.sustworks.com/>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

MailBITS/11-Jun-01
------------------

**Sustainable Softworks Sponsoring TidBITS** -- We're pleased to
  announce our latest TidBITS sponsor, the network utility company
  Sustainable Softworks. Best known for their IPNetRouter program,
  which turns almost any Mac into a feature-rich network router,
  Sustainable Softworks also makes other useful utilities like
  IPNetMonitor, which helps you test and troubleshoot network
  connections and IPNetTuner, which enables you to tweak Open
  Transport's internal settings. Most recently, Sustainable
  Softworks released IPNetSentry, an unobtrusive personal firewall
  which not only watches and deters Internet crackers from your Mac,
  but which also can improve overall reliability by throwing out
  crash-causing malformed packets. But IPNetRouter remains
  Sustainable Softworks' flagship program, and it's one we've come
  to rely on. Any time you read an article or a TidBITS Talk message
  in our database, or even receive an issue of TidBITS via email,
  that data has passed through IPNetRouter at some point. It's
  stable, flexible, reliable, and backed by outstanding online
  support from its author, Peter Sichel. Also important is the fact
  that Peter and others at Sustainable Softworks have long been
  active members of the Macintosh Internet community. We couldn't be
  happier to welcome Sustainable Softworks to our select group of
  sponsoring companies. [ACE]

<http://www.sustworks.com/>


**Word Macro Security Fix Available** -- Microsoft has posted the
  Microsoft Word for Macintosh Security Update: Macro Vulnerability,
  a long title for a simple and important fix. In Word 98 and Word
  2001, malicious code can be embedded as a macro in Rich Text
  Format (RTF) files, which would not be recognized by Word's
  internal macro-checking mechanism. The update prevents macros from
  opening without a security warning. The problem only affects Word
  98 and Word 2001, not the other components of Microsoft Office.
  The update is a 361K download. [JLC]

<http://www.microsoft.com/mac/download/office2001/wordmacro.asp>


**Mac.Simpsons Email Worm Targets Microsoft Software** -- Last
  week, reports surfaced of a new Mac OS worm that arrives by email
  and takes advantage of Microsoft email clients Outlook Express and
  Entourage to send itself to everyone in the infected user's
  address book. According to Symantec, the AppleScript worm, dubbed
  "Mac.Simpsons@mm" for its promise to show hundreds of never-
  before-seen episodes of the popular Simpsons television series,
  may also remove all the user's messages from the Sent Items
  folder, however, they can be retrieved from the Deleted Items
  folder. The attachment appears as an AppleScript script named
  Simpsons Episodes.

<http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/mac.simpsons@mm.html>

  Microsoft's Entourage application, the combination email client
  and personal information manager included with Office 2001, warns
  the user of suspicious activity before sending copies of the worm
  to everyone in the address book, but Outlook Express provides no
  such warning. The worm also places a copy of itself in the user's
  Startup Items folder, and reports suggest that it attempts to
  access a specific Web site using Internet Explorer. If you believe
  your Mac might have been compromised, check your Startup Items
  folder for the worm or other suspicious files (if your Mac isn't
  currently running, be sure to start it with the Shift key held
  down to disable startup items). [MHA]

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06139>


**Handspring Offers $100 Rebate For Old PDAs** -- On 07-Jun-01,
  Palm OS-compatible handheld vendor Handspring announced a trade-up
  program that offers users a $100 rebate on the thin Visor Edge
  handheld in exchange for nearly any old PDA, whether or not it
  works. The company will send Visor Edge purchasers a $100 rebate
  check upon receipt of the rebate form, original product code from
  the Visor Edge's box, and a qualifying old handheld. Acceptable
  trade-ins include Palm OS handhelds; Pocket PC and Windows CE
  handhelds; Symbian, Casio, Psion, or Sharp handhelds, and even old
  Apple Newtons, if you still have one of those around that you
  don't use. (Current Handspring Visor owners can send in their
  serial numbers to get a $100 discount on a Visor Edge and keep
  their current Visor.) Handspring says it has made arrangements to
  recycle the old devices. The offer is open only through 01-Jul-01
  to residents of the U.S. and Canada, and all mail requesting the
  rebate or packages containing the old handhelds must be postmarked
  by 31-Jul-01. [MHA]

<http://www.handspring.com/promos/tradeup.jhtml>


Spam Damned in Washington State
-------------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <ace@tidbits.com>

  Last week, the Washington State Supreme Court unanimously struck
  down last year's ruling from King County Superior Court Judge
  Palmer Robinson that Washington State's anti-spam law was
  unconstitutional. Judge Robinson held the law violated the
  interstate commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution because
  compliance would require spammers to identify specific email
  addresses as being connected with Washington State residents.
  Robinson is correct - that requirement is burdensome. But what she
  failed to consider was the fact that identification is at issue
  only when the email in question uses misleading information in the
  subject line, has an invalid reply address, or attempts to
  disguise routing information. In short, legitimate commercial
  email, even when unsolicited, doesn't run afoul of the Washington
  State anti-spam law at all, and thus the concern over
  identification is moot.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05871>

  The Washington State Supreme Court also disagreed with Robinson's
  opinion that inconsistent state laws regulating spam also create a
  burden on interstate commerce. The Supreme Court found that anti-
  spam laws in the 17 other states that have enacted such
  legislation have much overlap and complement each other in some
  respects, but there's no actual conflict.

  Justice Susan Owens expressed it best when she wrote, "the only
  burden the Act places on spammers is the requirement of
  truthfulness, a requirement that does not burden commerce at all
  but actually facilitates it by eliminating fraud and deception."

<http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/opindisp.cfm?docid=694168MAJ>

  Will the revitalization of the Washington State anti-spam law
  eliminate spam? No, though it's still an important decision that
  ultimately will reduce the amount of spam . The problem is that a
  large amount of spam is sent by small-time grifters, people who
  live in the cracks of society by not violating any criminal laws,
  changing names and addresses regularly, and staying out of the way
  of large companies with deep pockets. Those sort of people have
  always existed, but in the past their small predations have been
  limited. Thanks to the way the Internet magnifies the effort of an
  individual, these people can now aim their scams at a huge and
  ever-increasing audience. The economics of spamming aren't good,
  but they don't have to be, since that sort of life tends to be a
  hand-to-mouth existence, so an infinitesimally small success rate
  is sufficient.

  But having anti-spam legislation available as a tool for people
  and companies to use against spammers adds a level of risk to the
  act of spamming. It's not a big one, but since the margin of
  success with spam is so low anyway, the added risk doesn't have to
  be enormous to be effective. More importantly, by adding some risk
  to spamming, the legislation can help keep honest companies
  honest. If it were easier to send unsolicited commercial email
  with misleading subjects or deceptive routing information, some
  companies would no doubt take that approach, and hopefully this
  legislation will help dissuade them.

  We did see a drop in the amount of spam in 1999 that might have
  correlated with the passage of anti-spam legislation, but
  particularly when the Washington State statute was declared
  unconstitutional, the volume started to rise again, such that
  despite increasingly effective filters on our mail servers, both
  Geoff Duncan and I received more spam per day in 2000 than in 1998
  (Geoff had an average of 7.8 spam messages per day get through
  server-side filters in 2000; my average was 8.2 per day). You can
  see how we compared to other TidBITS readers in the results of a
  poll from a year ago.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05929>


**Speaking from Experience** -- As many of you know, back in July
  of 1998 TidBITS filed the first lawsuit against a spammer under
  the Washington State anti-spam law (see "TidBITS Sues Spammer" in
  TidBITS-439_). The spammer in question was flogging Bull's Eye
  Gold spamming software, and between all the TidBITS staff members,
  we had received close to 100 nearly identical copies of the spam.
  The gory legal details of how that case proceeded aren't
  particularly interesting, but here are the highlights.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05000>

  Our first hurdle was to find the spammer, Christopher Lee Knight,
  so we could serve him with papers about the suit. We had initially
  thought this would be relatively easy, since the Bull's Eye Gold
  spam in question gave a physical address in Los Angeles and phone
  number for Worldtouch Networks. Our first mistake was publicizing
  it before serving papers, since, as many people happily noted, the
  Bull's Eye Gold spam stopped immediately after we announced the
  suit. Unfortunately, that meant he knew we were on to him, and he
  went to ground.

  We sent a process serving company to the Worldtouch address, but
  they were never able to find Knight. We considered dropping the
  suit, but things quickly became more interesting, with other
  people chiming in that they'd tried to serve Knight with papers as
  well, and an anonymous informant claiming s/he knew lots of dirt
  on Knight and his girlfriend (a Nikole Ducatte) but was scared to
  talk. So we decided to spend some money to hire investigators, who
  produced some real details.

  It turned out that Christopher Lee Knight probably isn't our
  spammer's legal name: he was also known as Christopher Duke, and
  Christopher Joyce is most likely his real name. Between the time
  we filed the suit and the investigator found him, he had moved six
  times; by the end of the suit, the investigators recorded twelve
  different addresses in five states, with a final mailing address
  at a post office box in a sixth state. The investigators also did
  a quick asset check (detailed ones cost a lot more) and found a
  few thousand dollars in a bank account with recent activity. That
  seemed good enough to go ahead with, so we did.

  Eventually, the investigators managed to serve the person they had
  reason to believe was Christopher Lee Knight, although he denied
  the identification and refused to show ID to confirm his denial.
  Still, the judge in Washington State agreed that it was
  sufficiently likely that we had served the right person and let
  the case go forward. That gave Knight 60 days to respond to the
  charges or claim we'd gotten the wrong guy. None of that happened,
  and in fact nothing happened at all.

  After the 60 days passed, we applied for, and received, default
  judgement. That means we won the case, since Knight never showed
  up to defend himself. That left nothing to do but attempt to
  collect our winnings. Unfortunately, collection required hiring an
  attorney in California (more expense and delays) and then rehiring
  the investigation firm to look for Knight's assets yet one more
  time. This time they struck out on the bank accounts, determining
  in the process that Knight had left California and was staying in
  various motels in Connecticut. Since collecting in another state
  would involve hiring another attorney and investigators there, and
  it was clear that Knight could easily just hop over state lines
  any time, we decided not to throw more money at the project.

  The final information from the investigators included a juicy
  tidbit that suggested Knight (using the Christopher Joyce name and
  again accompanied by Nikole Ducatte) is now the president of a
  Pennsylvania company called O'So Lo Foods. They apparently sell
  low-carbohydrate foods, and you can check them out yourself on the
  Web, complete with staff pictures, in case you're wondering what
  these people look like.

<http://www.osolo.com/meetthecompany.html>


**Evaluating the Suit** -- The question is, was this lawsuit
  worthwhile? With one exception - the financial aspect, which cost
  us about $3,000 - I'd have to say yes. It shut down one of the
  most egregious spammers of the time (to judge from the many email
  messages we received commiserating about Worldtouch Network), it
  drew a great deal of public attention to the spam problem, and it
  seemed as though it helped reduce the volume of spam for a while.
  In the end, we're happy with the outcome, though if anyone would
  like to help defray our legal costs, we would happily accept
  contributions to TidBITS via Kagi or through PayPal to our
  <editors@tidbits.com> address (in the event that more money comes
  in than we spent, we'll donate it to an appropriate non-profit).

<http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>
<https://www.paypal.com/refer/pal=editors%40tidbits.com>

  One way or another, it's clear to me that we as a society have a
  long way to go in learning how to live with this Internet genie
  we've released. But we'll have to take the bad with the good, and
  I remain hopeful that one day we'll be have effective social and
  technical mechanisms that will eliminate spam from our lives
  without the need for legislation.


iBook or TiBook?
----------------
  by Mike Whybark <mike@whybark.com>

  What would you do if you could exchange some work for either a
  shiny new PowerBook G4 Titanium or Apple's latest portable wonder,
  the iBook (Dual USB)? It's not an easy question, since both Macs
  induce excessive levels of drool, but it's one I'm going to try to
  answer in this article. Obviously, my situation is unique: a
  freelance job for a multimedia software company requires a
  Macintosh laptop computer, and another client would be happy to
  pay me for an assignment with the very laptop I need for the first
  gig. If you're trying to decide between these two machines, please
  follow along, and I hope my train of thought will help lead you to
  a decision as well.

  The machine I imagined for myself was a current, speedy Mac OS
  portable, both tough and lightweight. I knew it needed to be
  fairly high-powered, since I was hoping for a three-year life
  cycle. Since I work on projects that require a great deal of image
  editing and compositing as well as audio, I knew I'd want a CD-R
  drive and a large internal hard disk, a complement of fast ports,
  lots of RAM, and a large, bright, high-resolution display.
  Additionally, I needed an AirPort card so I could work on my home
  AirPort network. At first blush, a PowerBook G4 Titanium, with its
  modern PowerPC G4 processor, high-end specs, and huge LCD display
  sounded like it might fit the bill well.


**Titanium Problems** -- I began my research at the Apple Web
  site. I was surprised to learn that the PowerBook G4 Titanium is
  available in only three varieties, two 400 MHz models
  distinguished by differing hard disk sizes, 20 GB and 30 GB, and a
  500 MHz model with a 30 GB hard disk.

  Somewhat disappointing was the single optical drive choice: a
  DVD-ROM drive, with no alternatives available for the Titanium's
  thin form factor. I've had a DVD-ROM drive in an older machine for
  years, but have never used it to read a DVD-ROM. Since I often
  need to burn data to a CD, the lack of ready access to a CD-R
  drive can seriously impede my work. I already own an external
  FireWire CD-R, so a built-in CD-R in the portable wasn't an
  absolute requirement - although a FireWire port would then be
  necessary. The Titanium supports FireWire, but my initial
  disappointment about the lack of a CD-R option led me to consider
  other possibilities. One option immediately presented itself.

<http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?family=PowerBook>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06269>


**Checking Out the iBook** -- On 01-May-01, Apple announced the
  new iBook (Dual USB). It is so different from the old candy-
  colored iBook in appearance and features that it was almost
  instantly nicknamed the "iceBook" for its gleaming white plastic
  body. Substantially smaller and lighter than the old curvy iBook,
  the new iBook actually beats the svelte Titanium in the
  miniaturization department. It's neither as broad nor as a deep as
  the Titanium, at 4.9 pounds weighs 0.4 pounds less, and it's a
  mere 0.35 inches thicker when closed.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06422>

  The similarity of size and weight caught my eye - I hadn't
  considered the old iBook as an option due to its 6.6 pound weight
  and expansive dimensions. Looking more closely, I was pleased to
  note that the iBook also sports a FireWire port. Of course, it's
  AirPort-ready, but more interesting, it has four available optical
  drives - CD-ROM, CD-RW, DVD-ROM, and a CD-RW/DVD-ROM combination
  (you choose one when purchasing; unlike the PowerBook G3 series,
  the drive isn't in a swappable bay). And despite these features,
  its price _starts_ at well over a thousand dollars less than the
  Titanium.

<http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?family=iBook>

  Some more legwork on the iBook revealed its three main
  restrictions when compared to the Titanium: the choice of
  processor, the system bus speed, and the video and display
  systems. In each case, as one might expect, the Titanium is more
  powerful.

  The most notable limitation, of course, is the iBook's use of the
  PowerPC G3 processor instead of the faster PowerPC G4, which also
  includes the Velocity Engine processing unit for dramatic speed
  increases in certain types of applications that have been
  explicitly compiled to support it. Mac OS X itself takes advantage
  of the Velocity Engine, and going forward, it's clear that the
  iBook will feel slower than the PowerBook G4 Titanium as both
  machines age. This means that the iBook may not meet my three-year
  life cycle requirement.

  Secondly, the iBook uses a 66 MHz system bus as compared to the
  Titanium's 100 MHz system bus, which can impact the overall
  performance of the machine in situations where a lot of data needs
  to be moved across the system bus. However, the iBook's 256K L2
  cache is on the PowerPC G3 chip itself, providing a 500 MHz data
  path, whereas the Titanium's 1 MB of L2 cache is on the processor
  module and runs at half the speed of the CPU (either 200 or 250
  MHz).

<http://www.apple.com/powerbook/specs.html>
<http://www.apple.com/ibook/specs.html>

  Finally, and most glaringly (pun intended), the issue of video and
  displays comes into consideration. The iBook's built-in display
  system is a 12-inch diagonal XVGA TFT active matrix LCD, running
  at a maximum resolution of 1,024 by 768 pixels. That's not shabby
  by any means, though it can't compare with the Titanium's 15.2-
  inch wide-screen LCD running at 1,152 by 768 pixels.

  The iBook also features nearly the same video subsystem as the
  older PowerBook G3 (FireWire), the ATI RAGE Mobility 128M with AGP
  2x. However, the iBook's standard VGA-out port is limited to
  providing video-mirroring of the built-in display. That's fine for
  projection or use of a single large monitor at the iBook's highest
  resolution, but in contrast, the PowerBook G4 Titanium supports
  monitor spanning, so, when available, that giant expanse of screen
  can be complemented by another.

  Finally, the iBook lacks a PC Card slot found in the Titanium, but
  given the functionality and ports built into the iBook, I can't
  see any particular need for PC Card expansion.


**Outside Opinions** -- Having realized that the iBook was a
  viable option for my needs if I adjusted certain expectations, I
  now faced the task of separating my needs from my desires, and for
  that, I've long had good luck seeking the advice of others.

  I began with my wife. She listened to me lay the issues out, but
  in the end for her it was a clear-cut decision based on price; she
  thought that the significantly cheaper iBook was the preferred
  option. An enquiry to a list of computer professionals, most of
  whom are not Mac people, yielded the same choice but with a new
  perspective. The discussion there determined, based upon my use
  patterns and peripherals, that the machine under consideration was
  unlikely to be a replacement for my existing Power Mac G4 desktop
  system, and thus it would be more sensible to obtain a smaller,
  lighter, and cheaper "orbital" system.

  A query to the savvy Mac users on TidBITS Talk turned up somewhat
  different opinions that favored the Titanium over the iBook,
  citing display and screen size most frequently, followed by
  longevity, speed, and processor concerns. Folks on TidBITS Talk
  also zeroed in on my desire for a CD-R in the portable as
  dispensable.

  Ever the iconoclast, TidBITS Contributing Editor Matt Neuburg
  suggested a PowerBook G3 (FireWire) because of its robust suite of
  professional features and lowering price in the face of the new
  portables. His observations are cogent, but since size and weight
  predominated in my mind as the narrowing factors, I didn't look
  closely at that machine as an option. However, its dual-battery
  capacity and resale pricing (I saw one on eBay with Final Cut Pro
  for about $1,800) make it an attractive cost/value comparison to
  the iBook for the professional user.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=1390>

  The final sources of information I pursued with regard to the
  iBook were Macintosh price-and-bundle tracking sites, plus
  discussion groups and bulletin boards. I learned some interesting
  things from these forums, most notably that a number of people
  were considering stepping down from the Titanium to the new iBook,
  and that despite its space age construction, the Titanium's thin
  but large form factor contributed to it feeling fragile. Other
  negatives that cropped up around the Titanium related to problems
  with the DVD-ROM drives, slight keyboard impressions on the screen
  when closed (caused by dirt and skin oils deposited on the
  keyboard), and poor AirPort range due to the antenna placement and
  titanium shielding. Although Apple will hopefully work out these
  design kinks, it won't happen in time for this purchase. On the
  timing issue, although Apple has had trouble shipping machines in
  quantity when promised, the new iBooks (and particularly the
  CD-ROM model) do seem to be shipping steadily and for some online
  orders, before promised.

  I also read of some problems that new iBook owners were
  experiencing. The first problem that surfaced involved
  difficulties with the audio output of the iBooks, solvable only
  with a restart; Apple responded immediately with a software update
  that Apple recommends all iBook owners download and install. The
  second problem involved varying problems with the trackpad, such
  as wandering or jumping cursors. The trackpad problem reports are
  still coming in and no resolution or clear indication of the scope
  of the problem is currently available. [Having just received my
  new iBook from Small Dog Electronics, I can say that the cursor
  wandering and jumping is, at least on my machine, related to
  touching the large trackpad surface accidentally with multiple
  fingers. -Adam]

<http://asu.info.apple.com/swupdates.nsf/artnum/n12255>

  Reading that brick-and-mortar merchants frequently had the iBook
  in stock inspired me to pay a visit to my local Computer Store in
  Seattle. I expected I would be more impressed by the form factor
  and screen size of the Titanium. However, once I was able to use
  both machines side-by-side, I found that the keyboard, trackpad,
  and button layout on the iBook was noticeably more comfortable. In
  particular, the Titanium has an extra half-inch or so of lip
  between the front edge of the machine and the trackpad button;
  every time I went to hit the button with my thumb, I smacked this
  lip instead. On the iBook, although the trackpad and button are
  the same size and shape as on the Titanium, I didn't have the
  problem with the lip. By itself, this isn't a huge issue - I'm
  sure I'd get used to avoiding the Titanium's lip right away. But
  overall, I just found the iBook more comfortable.

  The iBook display was extremely crisp and bright. Even at the
  highest resolution of 1,024 by 768, I had no difficulty looking at
  it or hitting even small controls. The Titanium's larger display
  was just fine, but for some reason, I saw the iBook's display more
  clearly. Finally, the Titanium's slot-loading DVD-ROM ejects to
  the front of the machine, which would be a minor hassle when I use
  the machine in bed. The side-mounted, tray-loading configuration
  of the iBook wouldn't suffer this problem. Another bonus on the
  iBook side for lap use is my initial impression that it runs
  cooler than the Titanium. A lap warmer can be nice in the cold,
  rainy months, but I don't need to bake my thighs otherwise.

  Finally, I was impressed at how _small_ the iBook looks, while the
  Titanium's width gives the impression of size. The difference
  between them is only 2.2 inches, measured edge-to-edge the long
  way, but in packages this small, a few inches matters a lot.


**Choosing a Book** -- To sum up, I found the pricing of the iBook
  far more attractive than the Titanium's pricing. The low price
  also helped me soften my desire for a three-year life cycle. The
  main technical differences, such as CPU speed, display size, and
  monitor spanning capabilities turned out not to be crucial because
  I'm planning to use the portable in conjunction with my primary
  desktop Mac. Finally, the opportunity to handle the two machines
  side-by-side enabled me to determine that for whatever intangible
  reason, I preferred the feel of the iBook.

  In the end, the iBook most closely suits my needs. Its up-to-date
  ports provide access to my supporting cast of peripherals here at
  home, so much so that I decided to get the least expensive CD-ROM
  model (though with more RAM and an extra battery). The iBook's
  Lilliputian stature means I can travel with it easily, and the
  price difference between it and the Titanium allows me to save
  some of the money I earned recently for the proverbial rainy day
  (which may come in the form of my late-summer electric bill here
  on the power-challenged West Coast). I'm looking forward to
  opening the box on my new iBook.

  [Mike Whybark plays a bright-blue electric mandolin in the
  Seattle-based Bare Knuckle Boxers and has designed user
  interfaces, logos, and Web sites for the DVD anime classic
  Bubblegum Crisis and two Better Homes and Gardens CD-ROMs, among
  others. Most recently he led the initial development of an online
  sweepstakes and contest management system for iPromotions, now a
  division of 24/7 Media, Inc.]

<http://mike.whybark.com/>
<http://www.bareknuckleboxers.com/>


$$

 Non-profit, non-commercial publications may reprint articles if
 full credit is given. Others please contact us. We don't guarantee
 accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and
 company names may be registered trademarks of their companies.

 This file is formatted as setext. For more information send email
 to <setext@tidbits.com>. A file will be returned shortly.

 For information: how to subscribe, where to find back issues,
 and more, email <info@tidbits.com>. TidBITS ISSN 1090-7017.
 Send comments and editorial submissions to: <editors@tidbits.com>
 Back issues available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/>
 And: <ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/>
 Full text searching available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/search/>
 -------------------------------------------------------------------




