TidBITS#586/02-Jul-01
=====================

  The Handspring Visor sets itself apart amongst Palm OS organizers
  for its Springboard slot, an expansion port that accommodates
  modules such as MP3 music players and even a cellular phone. Jeff
  Carlson looks at a handful for the handheld in this issue. Also,
  Microsoft is handed a victory in its antitrust case, Adam relates
  some offbeat bits about MacHack 2001, and we note the passing of
  Usenet founder Jim Ellis.

Topics:
    MailBITS/02-Jul-01
    Breaking Up Is Hard to Do
    MacHack 2001 Code Fragments
    Diving Into Visor Springboard Modules

<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-586.html>
<ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/2001/TidBITS#586_02-Jul-01.etx>

Copyright 2001 TidBITS Electronic Publishing. All rights reserved.
   Information: <info@tidbits.com> Comments: <editors@tidbits.com>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by:
* READERS LIKE YOU! You can help support TidBITS via our voluntary <- NEW!
   contribution program. Our thanks this week to Takahito Kameoka,
   Larry Rosenblum, and J.C. Bousson for their generous support!
   <http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>

* APS Tech -- 800/395-5871 -- <sales@apstech.com>
   Burn a full CD in less than five minutes with the APS CD-RW
   16x10x40 FireWire Plus. FireWire and USB ports let you easily
   connect to all recent Macs. Order at: <http://www.apstech.com/>

* WinStar Northwest Nexus. Visit us at <http://www.nwnexus.com/>.
   Internet business solutions throughout the Pacific Northwest.

* Small Dog Electronics: Apple 15" DVI Studio Display: $499! <------- NEW!
   NEC LCD 1810x 18.1" XtraviewWide LCD Display Black: $1,199!
   Silicon Graphics 1600SW Grey LCD with Formac PCI Card: $1,189!
   Apple 15" LCD ADC: $499! <http://smalldog.com/> - 802/496-7171

* Bare Bones Software BBEdit 6.1 -- Built for Mac OS X
   The award-winning HTML and text editor is now native for
   Mac OS X. Buy, upgrade, or download the demo at our Web site:
   <http://www.barebones.com/> It doesn't suck.

* ConceptDraw v1.61 -- Create your concept! Ideal tool
   for interactive diagrams, org charts, building
   schematics, UML, flowcharts. Mac/PC compatible.
   Give it a try at <http://www.conceptdraw.com/>

* Save $100 Now! LAN Bundle. Perfect for small networks. <----------- NEW!
   Includes IPNetRouter, IPNetMonitor and 4 IPNetTuner licenses.
   Get the best possible performance from your network. Only $119
   from Sustainable Softworks: <http://www.sustworks.com/tb/>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

MailBITS/02-Jul-01
------------------

**Usenet Creator Jim Ellis Dies** -- Jim Ellis, one of the
  creators of the globe-spanning messaging system Usenet, died
  28-Jun-01 from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. He was 45. Jim and
  colleague Tom Truscott came up with the basic Usenet idea at Duke
  University in 1979, along with its first implementation between
  Duke and the University of North Carolina. At its simplest, Usenet
  is just a way for computers to share and synchronize sets of
  files, but its social impact was far more significant. For years
  Usenet was the primary instrument of the Internet community, and
  today plays host to tens of thousands of groups devoted to a wide
  variety of topics. Usenet culture was also the breeding ground for
  things like smileys, flame wars, quoting and reply etiquette, and
  (of course) spam. Jim had most recently been working as a security
  consultant for Sun Microsystems, and - though he never made any
  money from Usenet - received numerous honors for his contributions
  to the Internet world. [GD]


Breaking Up Is Hard to Do
-------------------------
  by Geoff Duncan <geoff@tidbits.com>

  In a substantial victory for Microsoft Corporation, last week the
  Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia unanimously reversed
  Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's ordered breakup of Microsoft under
  U.S. antitrust laws. The 125-page ruling comes more than a year
  after Judge Jackson's initial order to break up the company, and
  more than eighteen months after his finding of fact that Microsoft
  constituted a monopoly.

<http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200106/00-5212a.txt>

  Although the Appeals Court upheld that Microsoft is indeed a
  monopoly and engaged in anti-competitive practices, it also
  concluded that Judge Jackson engaged in "serious judicial
  misconduct" in his statements outside of court and to the media
  during the penalty phase of the trial. The Appeals Court then
  remanded a portion of the case back to district court, but under
  terms which gut substantial portions of the government's case
  against Microsoft. The bottom line is that Microsoft was found to
  have violated the law, but is unlikely to face serious
  consequences for those actions, and almost certainly will not be
  broken into two or more companies.

  We've repeatedly examined the Microsoft antitrust case in TidBITS,
  but in essence two central points of the government's case were
  reviewed by the Appeals court:

* That Microsoft maintained a market monopoly in operating systems
  through anti-competitive actions; and

* That Microsoft tried to monopolize the browser market by tying
  its browser to its existing operating system monopoly.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbser=1152>


**The Government's Victory** -- The first point above is largely
  established through Judge Jackson's findings of fact from late
  1999, and an Appeals Court can't just toss out those findings
  unless they're plainly erroneous or it can be proven the trial
  court was substantially biased. The Appeals Court overturned a
  handful of Judge Jackson's findings of fact, but for the most
  part, those findings were upheld and the Appeals Court was not
  able to find instances of _actual_ bias in Judge Jackson's
  findings.

  This is the part of the Appeals Court decision the government can
  tout as their victory: unless Microsoft appeals to the Supreme
  Court (and wins), Microsoft now has a monopoly in the eyes of the
  law. Contrary to popular opinion, under U.S. law it's not illegal
  to have a monopoly in a particular market. However, it _is_
  illegal to create or protect a monopoly by stifling competition in
  that market. This means that in the future, anyone who wants to
  come after Microsoft has half their case made for them: they won't
  have to prove Microsoft has a monopoly, they'll only have to prove
  that Microsoft has deliberately stifled or eliminated competition
  in that market. This potentially exposes Microsoft to heaps of
  litigation from other companies, particularly as Microsoft
  continues to integrate more and more previously separate
  functionality into what it considers to be its core operating
  system. Microsoft's never-subtle CEO Steve Ballmer has repeatedly
  said he doesn't feel there's any limit to what Microsoft can
  unilaterally declare part of its operating system; now he may find
  that stance is more frequently challenged in court.

  Incidentally, this is the part of the case where Apple figured
  most prominently: the Appeals Court upheld that Microsoft
  illegally engaged in anti-competitive practices when it used
  threats of cancelling Microsoft Office for the Mac "as a club" to
  force Apple to adopt Internet Explorer as the default Web browser
  installed with the Mac OS.


**Microsoft's Victory** -- It's on the second point - that
  Microsoft illegally tried to leverage its Windows monopoly to
  create a monopoly in the browser market - that Microsoft can
  declare its victory. First, the Appeals Court found that the
  government failed either to define the browser market or to
  establish that Microsoft set up barriers to protect that market
  for itself. Furthermore, it reversed this finding
  _without_remand_, which means the government can't even try to
  make the point again in a retrial. Unless the government appeals
  to the Supreme Court (and wins), it's now a matter of law that
  Microsoft did not attempt to monopolize the browser market.

  Further, the Appeals Court disagreed with Judge Jackson's finding
  that Microsoft committed a "per se" violation of the Sherman
  Antitrust Act by integrating its browser with the operating
  system. As a legal standard, "per se" basically means Microsoft's
  integration of the two products was "in itself" a violation of
  law, simply because they did it. However, the Appeals Court found
  that since the software industry is unlike other industries to
  which antitrust laws have been applied, a "per se" analysis of the
  law wasn't valid. Instead, Microsoft would have to be found in
  violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act by "rule of reason," a
  different legal standard which basically grants leeway to the
  first company to integrate what had previously been perceived as
  two disparate markets. The Appeals Court tossed this issue back to
  the district court for resolution (also stipulating that it be
  heard by someone other than Judge Jackson). However, since the
  Appeals Court found that the government failed to define a browser
  market, the government would have to prove integrating Internet
  Explorer with Windows harmed competition in the browser market
  without "arguing any theory of harm that depends on a precise
  definition of browsers or barriers to entry." That's going to be
  hard to do, so the government faces a heavy burden to prove this
  part of its case at a retrial.


**Jackson's Packin'** -- The harshest words of the Appeals Court
  ruling were reserved for Thomas Penfield Jackson, the trial judge
  for the Microsoft case. Judge Jackson and the Appeals Court have
  previously disagreed in regard to Microsoft: in 1998, a three
  judge panel on the Appeals Court overturned Jackson's preliminary
  injunction barring Microsoft from requiring computers pre-install
  Internet Explorer with Windows. Although the Appeals Court did not
  find any instance where Jackson demonstrated actual bias in his
  handling of the case, they held that Jackson violated ethical
  rules by holding "secret sessions" with journalists during the
  penalty phase of the trial, which "seriously tainted the
  proceedings before the District Court and called into question the
  integrity of the judicial process." In reversing Jackson's ruling,
  the Appeals Court also requires that any new penalty consideration
  or retrial take place before a different judge. So, this case is
  over for the man who made history presiding over the Microsoft
  antitrust trial.


**You Get What You Settle For** -- Since Judge Jackson's original
  ruling, the U.S. presidency has changed hands. During his
  campaign, President Bush repeatedly stated he wasn't in favor of
  breaking up Microsoft, and his Republican administration is
  generally not in favor of regulating markets or business activity.
  Although Attorney General John Ashcroft has said very little about
  the Microsoft case since assuming his post, in the wake of the
  Appeals Court decision, it would seem the odds that Microsoft and
  the government will settle out of court have increased.

  However, the federal government isn't the only plaintiff: nineteen
  states are also party to the antitrust case, and so far haven't
  shown much interest in backing down. During settlement talks in
  mid-2000, the states were said to have resisted settlement
  proposals, and so far the states seem to feel the Appeals Court
  ruling upholds the core of the case. It's conceivable the Justice
  Department and Microsoft might agree to terms of a settlement, but
  the states could refuse to go along with it. Under a statute known
  as the Tunney Act, any proposed settlement would have to be
  reviewed by a federal judge in a hearing, and the states could
  urge the judge to stop any proposed deal on the basis it wasn't in
  the public interest. After all, Microsoft's failure to adhere to
  the terms of a 1995 court settlement are how the current antitrust
  case got underway in the first place.

  For now, the next move is in the hands of the Justice Department,
  which must decide whether to pursue the case or a settlement, and
  the whole process will undoubtedly take several more years to
  unravel.


MacHack 2001 Code Fragments
---------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <ace@tidbits.com>

  Last week I wrote about how Mac OS X fared at the MacHack
  developers conference, and I also looked at the results of the
  annual hack contest. However, MacHack is such an unusual
  conference that I can't resist passing on a few other amusing
  bits.


**Only in America** -- Although MacHack brings over 300 people to
  the Holiday Inn Fairlane for the duration of the conference, there
  are often a few other guests who walk around looking bewildered at
  the high density of hackers and their Macintosh paraphernalia.
  This year, though, those of us at MacHack returned a modicum of
  bewilderment upon realizing that we were sharing the hotel with
  the American Station Wagon Owners Association. And indeed, in a
  cordoned-off section of the parking lot, there were a number of
  old station wagons lined up, their chrome polished and (in a few
  cases) wooden door panels buffed to a healthy sheen.

<http://www.aswoa.com/>

  It's tempting to poke fun at organizations like this, but there's
  nothing wrong with appropriately tempered fixations on consumer
  objects, like a station wagon or (dare I say?) a Macintosh. But if
  Macintosh users want to avoid becoming targets of ridicule, our
  Macintosh-related associations must continue to move forward and
  invent the future rather than living in the past. Otherwise we'll
  all be sitting around in thirty years, reminiscing about our 2001
  "Woodie" iMacs with their then-new LCD screens. (I doubt Apple
  will release a faux wood iMac at July's Macworld Expo in New York
  City, but since the iMac is the only Apple product with a CRT-
  based monitor, it's safe to assume the iMac's bulky cathode ray
  tube display will disappear in favor of a sleek and electricity-
  saving LCD screen).

<http://www.nationalwoodieclub.com/>


**Please Raid This Tomb** -- It's a MacHack tradition for many of
  the attendees to go to a movie on the last night, just before the
  midnight ice cream social that marks the final official event. The
  quality of the movie isn't particularly relevant, since it's
  likely to be drowned out by the non-stop commentary from the
  audience, such as loud cries of "Product placement!" every time a
  gratuitous burst of advertising intrudes into the film's fantasy
  world. This year's movie - Lara Croft: Tomb Raider - fit in
  perfectly. As you might expect from a movie based on a video game,
  it wasn't finely crafted cinematic entertainment. The high point
  of the film came at the post-movie ice cream social, where many of
  us crowded around Apple's Keith Stattenfield as he led an informal
  discussion of inspired zaniness in which we deconstructed and
  debated the movie. Topics included the possibility of deducting
  expenses (thousands of rounds of poorly aimed ammunition, killer
  robot repair bills, imported dust) related to the business use of
  a practice tomb in the home of a professional tomb raider; the
  legal liability and insurance implications of having an in-house
  tomb (a good reason to install bulletproof glass walls and
  automatic steel shutters that slam down loudly - again, deductible
  expenses); and speculation about the content of a trade magazine
  devoted to the profession - Tomb Raider Monthly.

  As Keith summarized at the end of our marathon session
  (undoubtedly longer than the film's screenwriting sessions), "This
  is not a good movie. This is a baaaaad movie." That's not to say
  you shouldn't see it - but go with the right crowd.


**Open Source and the Mac** -- Although Eric Raymond, open source
  proponent and last year's MacHack keynote speaker, vowed to return
  to MacHack, he and the iBook we all bought for him were nowhere to
  be seen. The open source concept took some hits too, with derisive
  comments about the viral nature of the GNU Public License (GPL), a
  popular open source license that requires all released
  modifications to GPL-licensed code also be made available under
  the GPL. The bursting of the dot-com bubble undoubtedly played a
  factor as well, since many MacHack developers remained unconvinced
  about the viability of the open source business model during Eric
  Raymond's six-hour keynote, and the failure of a number of high-
  profile companies using the open source approach (including Andy
  Hertzfeld's Eazel, which was developing Nautilus, a better shell
  interface for Linux) lent credence to last year's skepticism.

<http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05994>
<http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html>
<http://www.eazel.com/>


**MacHack CDs Now Available** -- Finally, a CD-ROM compiling this
  year's Hack Contest entries as well as papers and presentations
  given at the 2001 conference are available for $20 plus $5
  shipping ($15 for international delivery). Also available for $20
  is the MacHack Historical CD, which collects hacks, papers, and
  presentations from the first 14 years of MacHack; you can order
  both CDs together for $35. All the proceeds from CD sales go
  towards funding MacHack 2002.

<http://www.machack.com/>


Diving Into Visor Springboard Modules
-------------------------------------
  by Jeff Carlson <jeffc@tidbits.com>

  When you compare handhelds from Palm and Handspring, the two
  product families look quite similar. They all run the Palm OS,
  which includes a built-in calendar, address book, to-do list, and
  notepad; most of the models share the same type of screen and
  hardware buttons; and you can synchronize the data on a handheld
  with your Mac at the push of a button.

  However, the Handspring Visor features one notable difference: the
  Springboard expansion port, a slot on the back that accepts a wide
  variety of hardware modules (see "A Handheld Surprise: the
  Handspring Visor" in TidBITS-521_). I've been using a Visor
  Platinum device with a host of Springboard modules over the past
  few months while writing the Handspring Visor: Visual QuickStart
  Guide (Peachpit Press, $20, available at Macworld Expo New York,
  then in wider release at the end of July). Here's a roundup of a
  few noteworthy modules that run the gamut from storing information
  to accessing the Internet and making phone calls.

<http://www.handspring.com/>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05844>
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0201745798/tidbitselecto00A/>


**Handspring VisorPhone** -- I'm convinced that the idea for
  Handspring's VisorPhone came not so much out of a desire to
  capitalize on digital technology as the dream of carrying one less
  gadget around. The VisorPhone is a module that effectively turns
  your Visor into a cellular phone. But it's also better than a
  cellular phone for one simple reason: it gives your phone a usable
  interface! If you've ever tried to add a person's phone number to
  your phone's memory, you know what a pain it is to keep hitting
  number keys to scroll through letters. With the VisorPhone, the
  contents of your Address Book are immediately available to the
  phone. If you don't have a number in your Address Book, the
  VisorPhone software provides a regular phone key layout with nice
  large buttons to tap. You can set up to 50 speed-dial buttons,
  meaning you might not even need to access the Address Book.

<http://www.handspring.com/products/visorphone/>

  Having a decent interface also means that some awkward operations
  on a regular phone are made much simpler. For example, I loathe
  the prospect of setting up a three-way call, because invariably
  one person on the line ends up parroting "Are you still there?"
  while establishing the connection. With the VisorPhone, it's
  simple: call one person, then tap a button to put them on hold.
  Call the next person, tap the big 3-Way Call button, and you're
  all set.

  Best of all, you don't need to remain locked into the VisorPhone
  software while you're calling. To conserve battery life, your
  Visor turns off after its standard waiting period (usually one or
  two minutes) without breaking the connection (the VisorPhone gets
  power from its own rechargeable battery, which Handspring says
  offers three days of standby time and three hours of talk time, so
  it doesn't burn through your Visor's juice). You can also switch
  to other applications in case you need to confirm an appointment
  or look up another phone number while talking. The VisorPhone
  includes a headset, which is recommended, though you can hold the
  whole unit to your head at the risk of looking silly.

  The VisorPhone uses the GSM (Global System for Mobile
  communications) cellular network, so be sure the service is
  available in your area - GSM is the dominant network in Europe and
  is making inroads in the protocol-cluttered United States. Being
  based on GSM, the VisorPhone supports SMS (Short Message Service)
  text messaging, so you can send short text messages to folks with
  many types of GSM phones, other VisorPhone owners, or to email
  addresses. Using the included Blazer Web browser, you can also use
  the VisorPhone to access the Web (again, offering a better screen
  and interface than even the most advanced cellular phones).

<http://www.handspring.com/software/blazer_overview.jhtml>

  The only drawbacks to the VisorPhone are its price and size. At
  $249, you're paying more than the cost of most cellular phones
  (though Handspring is currently offering the VisorPhone for $99
  with the purchase of a Visor Prism or Visor Edge handheld). And,
  of course, you need to sign up for a compatible service plan (you
  can optionally buy the VisorPhone by itself if you already have a
  GSM service plan, but the price then rockets to $449). The
  module's size isn't much larger than the Springboard slot, but it
  does add some weight and bulk to the back of the Visor.

<http://www.handspring.com/products/visorphone/with_service.jhtml>

  As with most modern gadgets, however, you're paying for mobility
  as well as for whatever the gadget does, so consider what the
  reduction of one gadget is worth to you. Getting a VisorPhone may
  end up costing less in the long run, especially if you want
  Internet access that would normally require another Springboard
  module.


**OmniSky Wireless Modem** -- If you're looking just for wireless
  Internet access, it's hard to beat the OmniSky modem. I was an
  early tester of OmniSky's model for the Palm V, which looks like a
  sled that attaches to the back of the handheld; though functional,
  it infringes on the Palm V's main advantage, its thin profile. The
  OmniSky modem for the Visor is a compact improvement. A variety of
  monthly pricing plans are available, ranging from roughly $30 to
  $40 per month, plus $270 for the modem itself.

<http://www.omnisky.com/products/visor_index.jhtml>
<http://www.omnisky.com/products/serviceplans.jhtml>

  Like most Springboard modules, all the software you need is
  installed when you plug the modem in. It includes its own email
  and Web clients, plus directory software for looking up names and
  addresses. It also comes with several Web Clipping applications
  for specific companies, such as Barnes & Noble's online bookstore.
  (Web Clipping is the technology introduced with the Palm VII,
  which includes an internal wireless modem. Unlike typical Web
  browsing, Web Clipping programs - called Palm Query Applications,
  or PQAs - act as small forms that transmit your search criteria
  and receive only small, bandwidth-saving responses. You don't have
  to download a Web site's full page of information and graphics
  when using a Web Clipping application.)

  As a modem, you're not limited to using the OmniSky software. Any
  Internet software for the Palm will work, such as the Blazer
  browser or the Eudora Internet Suite for the Palm. One interesting
  feature of the built-in email client is its capability to check
  your email account when you're not online. An OmniSky server can
  periodically check your mail server (you can set the frequency)
  and flashes a light on the modem to indicate you have new mail
  waiting.

<http://www.eudora.com/internetsuite/>


**Xircom SpringPort Wireless Ethernet Module** -- So far, I've
  concentrated on getting Internet access via a cellular phone or
  wireless modem, but a recent entry in the Springboard arena gives
  you access to a wireless Ethernet network. The Xircom SpringPort
  Wireless Ethernet Module is basically AirPort for your Visor.
  Using the 802.11b-compatible device, you can connect to the
  Internet on your AirPort network. Since the SpringPort operates at
  11 Mbps, getting online is speedy.

<http://www.xircom.com/cda/page/0,1298,0-0-1_1-1727,00.html>

  You can also access other computers on your network, though the
  software options are currently limited - I'm aware of MacVNC and
  PalmVNC, which offer Timbuktu-like capabilities to use one machine
  from another. The Xircom SpringPort can also be configured to
  HotSync wirelessly, but unfortunately this works only under
  Windows because the HotSync software on the Mac has never featured
  network synchronization.

<http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/>

  In my opinion, though, the $300 SpringPort is too expensive,
  especially since 802.11b PC Cards that offer the same
  functionality sell for half of that price. I can see how corporate
  IS folks might use the SpringPort in a high concentration of
  Windows machines spread out over a large area, but the lack of
  network synchronization makes it a tough sell for Mac users. I
  hope that the price reflects the initial costs of squeezing
  wireless Ethernet functionality into a handheld package, and that
  prices will soon come down.


**MiniJam and SoundsGood** - I commented earlier that one appeal
  of the VisorPhone is to merge portable gadgets (a handheld and a
  cellular phone). The same applies to digital music players.
  Despite the popularity of the MP3 format, I wasn't interested
  until I could get a portable MP3 player. I still love the Rio500
  that I eventually bought, but these days I'd be more tempted by
  either the $260 InnoGear MiniJam or the $150 SoundsGood Audio
  Player. Both offer 64 MB of storage, offering about an hour's
  worth of music. (You can also purchase the MiniJam in a 32 MB
  configuration for $200 or a 96 MB version for $300.) Both also
  include external buttons for controlling playback, plus a
  headphone port (and headphones, of course).

  The songs are stored on the devices themselves, but the Visor
  provides a more extensive interface than just the physical
  controls. You can program the order of songs, play them randomly,
  or play them straight through. You also get all of the information
  that accompanies each song file (like the artist, album, genre,
  etc.).

<http://store.innogear.com/products.cfm>
<http://www.good.com/soundsgood/>

  The main advantage of the MiniJam is its expandability, which also
  accounts for its higher price. It can accommodate two MultiMedia
  Cards (memory cards about the size of a postage stamp), and
  therefore more memory. In addition to MP3 music, you can store
  electronic books or photos (reader software is available on the
  module).

  The SoundsGood player looks like the better deal for the money,
  and has a couple other advantages: it's smaller than the MiniJam,
  and it can be fitted into a separate $40 Energy Clip battery pack
  that can be used to play music without being connected to the
  Visor (especially good for when you're exercising, since it's less
  fragile than the Visor). Unfortunately, Good Technology has
  recently stopped handling the SoundsGood audio player, turning it
  over to PalmGear; further, it's not expandable like the MiniJam,
  and it doesn't include software to manage MP3 files on the
  Macintosh. But if you're not looking for anything flashy and have
  a Windows machine that can act as a music server (or perhaps
  Virtual PC, but I didn't test this), the SoundsGood might be an
  economical choice.

<http://www.palmgear.com/>


**Margi Presenter-to-Go** -- Every once in a while, I hear about
  something that makes me scratch my head and wonder why anyone
  bothered to come up with the idea, much less follow it through to
  an actual product. Such is the case of Margi's Presenter-to-Go, a
  Springboard module that enables you to run Microsoft PowerPoint
  presentations from your Visor.

<http://www.presenter-to-go.com/>

  Although I'm not a big fan of PowerPoint presentations,
  Presenter-to-Go pleasantly surprised me. After you've created your
  presentation, you use Margi's desktop software to prepare it for
  the Visor; it's transferred the next time you HotSync. Then, with
  the Springboard module in place, you connect a supplied monitor
  cable and power cable (the Visor doesn't have enough energy to
  power an external display) to a monitor or projector. Without
  cracking the lid of your laptop, you have a mobile presentation
  machine. Everything is reproduced in full color, and thankfully
  the software doesn't support many of the garish effects that
  PowerPoint has foisted upon the business world. In fact, you don't
  even need PowerPoint: a Margi print driver lets you "print" pages
  from any application to the Presenter-to-Go format.

  Although I don't personally need this type of module, I can see
  how people that need to give the same handful of presentations in
  many locations (companies looking for venture capital come to
  mind) can use their Visors to have their presentations at hand
  instead of lugging a laptop around.


**Off the Deep End** -- There are numerous other modules for the
  Visor, including digital cameras, GPS devices, and more. As an
  ever larger number of them appear, module lovers like me will have
  to face the dilemma of which module to use at any given time, not
  to mention the conundrum of how to carry around a slew of
  Springboard modules with a svelte Visor. Hmm... maybe I need a
  larger bag.



$$

 Non-profit, non-commercial publications may reprint articles if
 full credit is given. Others please contact us. We don't guarantee
 accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and
 company names may be registered trademarks of their companies.

 This file is formatted as setext. For more information send email
 to <setext@tidbits.com>. A file will be returned shortly.

 For information: how to subscribe, where to find back issues,
 and more, email <info@tidbits.com>. TidBITS ISSN 1090-7017.
 Send comments and editorial submissions to: <editors@tidbits.com>
 Back issues available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/>
 And: <ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/>
 Full text searching available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/search/>
 -------------------------------------------------------------------




